Athlon XP-M 2200+ vs Celeron B730
Primary details
Comparing Celeron B730 and Athlon XP-M 2200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | AMD Athlon XP-M |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 31 July 2012 (12 years ago) | 19 July 2004 (20 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $70 | $97 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron B730 and Athlon XP-M 2200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.67 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 2.0 | FSB |
| Bus rate | 4 × 5 GT/s | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 18 | 12.5 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | 54 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron B730 and Athlon XP-M 2200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Socket G2 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B730 and Athlon XP-M 2200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| FMA | + | - |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron B730 and Athlon XP-M 2200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B730 and Athlon XP-M 2200+ are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B730 and Athlon XP-M 2200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.335 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 July 2012 | 19 July 2004 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 27 Watt |
Celeron B730 has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon XP-M 2200+, on the other hand, has 29.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron B730 and Athlon XP-M 2200+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B730 and Athlon XP-M 2200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
