Ryzen 9 5950X vs Celeron N2808

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 9 5950X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.90
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD Ryzen 9
Architecture codenameBay Trail-M (2013−2014)Vermeer (Zen 3)
Release date22 May 2014 (10 years ago)5 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799
Current priceno data$349 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 9 5950X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.58 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.25 GHz4.9 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die sizeno dataCPU cores: 2x 80.7 sq. mm., I/O: 125 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 9 5950X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1170AM4
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 9 5950X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Smart Connect+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 9 5950X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 9 5950X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 9 5950X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size4 GB128 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth10.66 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series-
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD--
Graphics max frequency792 MHz-
InTru 3D--

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 9 5950X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 9 5950X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes4no data
USB revision3.0 and 2.0no data
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Number of USB ports5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron N2808 510
Ryzen 9 5950X 45652
+8851%

Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Celeron N2808 by 8851% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 May 2014 5 November 2020
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 105 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 9 5950X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron N2808 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 5950X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N2808 and Ryzen 9 5950X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N2808
Celeron N2808
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Ryzen 9 5950X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 41 vote

Rate Celeron N2808 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2279 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5950X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N2808 or Ryzen 9 5950X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.