Celeron G5925 vs B710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron B710
2011
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.07
Celeron G5925
2020
2 threads, 58 Watt
1.75
+2400%

Celeron G5925 outperforms Celeron B710 by a whopping 2400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking34012030
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency0.192.84
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)no data
Release date19 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$70no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads12
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s8 GT/s
Multiplier16no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)no data
L3 cache1.5 MB (shared)4 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size131 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors504 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPGA988,PPGA988FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt58 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 610
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron B710 0.07
Celeron G5925 1.75
+2400%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron B710 106
Celeron G5925 2787
+2529%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.07 1.75
Integrated graphics card 0.77 1.89
Recency 19 June 2011 1 July 2020
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 58 Watt

Celeron B710 has 65.7% lower power consumption.

Celeron G5925, on the other hand, has a 2400% higher aggregate performance score, 145.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron G5925 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B710 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron B710 is a notebook processor while Celeron G5925 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron B710 and Celeron G5925, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron B710
Celeron B710
Intel Celeron G5925
Celeron G5925

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 99 votes

Rate Celeron B710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 40 votes

Rate Celeron G5925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron B710 or Celeron G5925, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.