Core 2 Solo SL3400 vs Celeron 925

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3450not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency0.31no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Release date1 January 2011 (15 years ago)1 January 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Celeron 925 and Core 2 Solo SL3400: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data1 (Single-Core)
Threadsno data1
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 925 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataBGA956
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 925 and Core 2 Solo SL3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 925 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 925 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 are enumerated here.

VT-x-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2011 1 January 2009
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

Celeron 925 has an age advantage of 2 years.

Core 2 Solo SL3400, on the other hand, has 106% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 925 and Intel Core 2 Solo SL3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Celeron 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Solo SL3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 925 and Core 2 Solo SL3400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.