Core 2 Solo SL3400 vs Celeron 220
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3626 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Conroe (2006−2007) | no data |
| Release date | October 2007 (18 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 77 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 105 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1V-1.3375V | 1.05V-1.15V |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PBGA479 | BGA956 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo SL3400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo SL3400 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | no data |
| VT-x | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 17 Watt |
Core 2 Solo SL3400 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 11.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 220 and Intel Core 2 Solo SL3400. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
