Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs Celeron 827E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3431not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency0.52no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Release dateno dataNovember 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 827E and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s1333 MHz
Multiplier14no data
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB12 MB (shared)
L3 cache1.5 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size131 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data64 °C
Number of transistors504 Million820 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 827E and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 827E and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Celeron 827E and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 827E and Core 2 Extreme QX9650 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 827E and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1066DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 130 Watt

Celeron 827E has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 664.7% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Extreme QX9650, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 827E and Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 827E is a notebook processor while Core 2 Extreme QX9650 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 827E
Celeron 827E
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Core 2 Extreme QX9650

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 827E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 131 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 827E and Core 2 Extreme QX9650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.