i9-12900TE vs Celeron 725C
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 725C and Core i9-12900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 235 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | no data | 59.68 |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Alder Lake-S (2022) |
| Release date | 1 July 2011 (13 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 725C and Core i9-12900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1.5 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 215 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 725C and Core i9-12900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 725C and Core i9-12900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 725C and Core i9-12900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 725C and Core i9-12900TE are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 725C and Core i9-12900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 725C and Core i9-12900TE.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2011 | 4 January 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 16 |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 35 Watt |
Celeron 725C has 105.9% lower power consumption.
i9-12900TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 1500% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 725C and Core i9-12900TE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 725C is a notebook processor while Core i9-12900TE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 725C and Core i9-12900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
