Ryzen Threadripper 1940 vs Atom S1240
Primary details
Comparing Atom S1240 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Centerton (2012) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 11 December 2012 (11 years ago) | 29 July 2017 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Atom S1240 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 28 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Atom S1240 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1283 | SP3r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6.1 Watt | 180 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom S1240 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom S1240 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom S1240 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 Quad-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 1 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 10.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom S1240 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
| PCI support | PCI Support | no data |
| UART | UART | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 December 2012 | 29 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 14 |
| Threads | 4 | 28 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 180 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Atom S1240 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Atom S1240 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1940 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom S1240 and Ryzen Threadripper 1940, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
