Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 vs Celeron 667
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 667 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Architecture codename | Timna | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 4 June 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 667 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.67 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 36 MB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 129 mm2 | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 667 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 370S | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 667 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XDNA 2 NPU |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel i752 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 55 Watt |
Celeron 667 has 83.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, on the other hand, has 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 5900% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 667 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron 667 is a desktop processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 170 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 667 and Ryzen AI 9 HX 170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
