Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U vs Celeron 6205
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 674 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Tiger Lake | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
Power efficiency | no data | 72.52 |
Architecture codename | Tiger Lake U (2020) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
Release date | 1 September 2020 (4 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2/2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
L1 cache | 160 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 2.5 MB | 6 MB |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | BGA1499 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | AMD Radeon 740M |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 4.55 | 8.31 |
Recency | 1 September 2020 | 23 May 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U has 82.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 6205 and Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.