Geode LX 800 vs Celeron 445

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 445 and Geode LX 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataGeode LX
Architecture codenameConroe-CL (2008)Castle
Release dateMay 2008 (16 years ago)no data
Current price$23 $300

Detailed specifications

Celeron 445 and Geode LX 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.86 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz0.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size76 mm2no data
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 445 and Geode LX 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket771no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt3.6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 445 and Geode LX 800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity+no data
StatusAnnouncedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 445 and Geode LX 800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 445 and Geode LX 800 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 445 and Geode LX 800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 3 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron 445 and Geode LX 800. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Celeron 445 is a desktop processor while Geode LX 800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 445 and Geode LX 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 445
Celeron 445
AMD Geode LX 800
Geode LX 800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Celeron 445 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Geode LX 800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 445 or Geode LX 800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.