Ryzen 7 8700F vs Celeron 4305UE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 4305UE
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.10
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
20.15
+1732%

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a whopping 1732% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2307253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data64.47
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Phoenix
Release date1 October 2018 (5 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Current priceno data$269

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1528AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 4305UE 1.10
Ryzen 7 8700F 20.15
+1732%

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms Celeron 4305UE by 1732% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 4305UE 1699
Ryzen 7 8700F 31170
+1735%

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms Celeron 4305UE by 1735% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.10 20.15
Recency 1 October 2018 1 April 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 7 8700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 4305UE is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 22 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 4305UE or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.