A8-4500M vs Celeron 4305UE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 4305UE
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.06
A8-4500M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.06

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25012504
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency6.762.90
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date1 October 2018 (6 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4305UE and A8-4500M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography10 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4305UE and A8-4500M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1528FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and A8-4500M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and A8-4500M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and A8-4500M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4unknown

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610AMD Radeon HD 7640G (496 - 685 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and A8-4500M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 4305UE 1.06
A8-4500M 1.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 4305UE 1699
+0.2%
A8-4500M 1695

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 4305UE 668
+130%
A8-4500M 290

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 4305UE 1086
+67.3%
A8-4500M 649

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 1.75 1.10
Recency 1 October 2018 15 May 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Celeron 4305UE has 59.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

A8-4500M, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Celeron 4305UE and AMD A8-4500M.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE
AMD A8-4500M
A8-4500M

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 339 votes

Rate A8-4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 4305UE and A8-4500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.