Ryzen 5 1600AF vs Celeron 4305UE
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2735 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.86 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 2.73 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 1 October 2018 (7 years ago) | 11 October 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 5 1600AF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 5 1600AF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1528 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 5 1600AF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 5 1600AF are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 5 1600AF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and Ryzen 5 1600AF.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2018 | 11 October 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron 4305UE has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 1600AF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 4305UE and AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 4305UE is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
