Ryzen 5 1600AF vs Celeron 4205U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 4205U and Ryzen 5 1600AF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2578not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency5.40no data
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date23 January 2019 (5 years ago)11 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4205U and Ryzen 5 1600AF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm12 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4205U and Ryzen 5 1600AF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA 1528AM4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4205U and Ryzen 5 1600AF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4205U and Ryzen 5 1600AF are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4205U and Ryzen 5 1600AF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 900 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4205U and Ryzen 5 1600AF.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes12no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 January 2019 11 October 2019
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 4205U has a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 1600AF, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 4205U and Ryzen 5 1600AF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 4205U is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 1600AF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 4205U and Ryzen 5 1600AF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4205U
Celeron 4205U
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF
Ryzen 5 1600AF

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 130 votes

Rate Celeron 4205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 284 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600AF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 4205U or Ryzen 5 1600AF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.