EPYC 9825 vs Celeron 4305UE

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9825 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2426not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency6.75no data
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date1 October 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$13,006

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9825 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)144
Threads2288
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9825 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketIntel BGA 1528SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9825. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9825 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9825. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9825.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 144
Threads 2 288
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 390 Watt

Celeron 4305UE has 2500% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9825, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 7100% more physical cores and 14300% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9825. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 4305UE is a notebook processor while EPYC 9825 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9825, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE
AMD EPYC 9825
EPYC 9825

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9825 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 4305UE or EPYC 9825, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.