EPYC 9135 vs Celeron 4305UE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 4305UE
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.07
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+3317%

EPYC 9135 outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a whopping 3317% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking242696
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.26
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency6.7517.30
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Turin (2024)
Release date1 October 2018 (6 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speedno data3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketIntel BGA 1528SP5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 4305UE 1.07
EPYC 9135 36.56
+3317%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 4305UE 1699
EPYC 9135 58070
+3318%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.07 36.56
Recency 1 October 2018 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

Celeron 4305UE has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 3316.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 4305UE is a notebook processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 4305UE and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 4305UE or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.