C-50 vs Celeron 4305UE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 4305UE
2018, $107
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.96
+540%

Celeron 4305UE outperforms C-50 by a whopping 540% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27073573
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.01no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD C-Series
Power efficiency6.881.79
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWhiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date1 October 2018 (7 years ago)4 January 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 4305UE and C-50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2 GHz1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography10 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 4305UE and C-50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 1528FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 4305UE and C-50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 4305UE and C-50 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 4305UE and C-50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics 610AMD Radeon HD 6250

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 4305UE and C-50.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 4305UE 0.96
+540%
C-50 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 4305UE 1699
+548%
Samples: 5
C-50 262
Samples: 294

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 4305UE 668
+854%
C-50 70

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 4305UE 1086
+820%
C-50 118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 0.15
Integrated graphics card 1.74 0.22
Recency 1 October 2018 4 January 2011
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 9 Watt

Celeron 4305UE has a 540% higher aggregate performance score, 690.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

C-50, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Celeron 4305UE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD C-50 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 4305UE
Celeron 4305UE
AMD C-50
C-50

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 4305UE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 305 votes

Rate C-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 4305UE and C-50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.