Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Celeron 430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated2688
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.10
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Windsor (2006−2009)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)August 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$50no data
Current price$36 (0.7x MSRP)$53

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die size77 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 430 280
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 934
+234%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ outperforms Celeron 430 by 234% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 430 155
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 279
+80%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ outperforms Celeron 430 by 80% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron 430 160
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 505
+216%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ outperforms Celeron 430 by 216% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 430
Celeron 430
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 133 votes

Rate Celeron 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 304 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 430 or Athlon 64 X2 6000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.