AMD Athlon 64 3200+ vs Intel Celeron 430

#ad
Buy
VS

General info

Comparing Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release dateJune 2007 (16 years old)January 2001 (23 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$50$150
Current price$9.95 (0.2x MSRP)$87 (0.6x MSRP)

Technical specs

Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512K
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die size77 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature60 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775754
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 3200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 3200+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 3200+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 430 280
Athlon 64 3200+ 305
+8.9%

Athlon 64 3200+ outperforms Celeron 430 by 9% in Passmark.

Advantages and disadvantages


Cost $50 $150
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 89 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 3200+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 430 and Athlon 64 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 430
Celeron 430
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Athlon 64 3200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 126 votes

Rate Intel Celeron 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 79 votes

Rate AMD Athlon 64 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 430 or Athlon 64 3200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.