Xeon Platinum 8284 vs Celeron 420
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 420 and Xeon Platinum 8284 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Series | no data | Intel Xeon Platinum |
Architecture codename | Conroe-L (2007−2008) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
Release date | June 2007 (17 years ago) | 10 July 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $23 | $15,460 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 420 and Xeon Platinum 8284 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 56 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
Multiplier | no data | 30 |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 1.75 MB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 28 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 38.5 MB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 77 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 65 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 60 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 105 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 1V-1.3375V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 420 and Xeon Platinum 8284 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 8 (Multiprocessor) |
Socket | LGA775 | Socket P |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 240 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 420 and Xeon Platinum 8284. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | - | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
TSX | - | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 420 and Xeon Platinum 8284 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | + |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 420 and Xeon Platinum 8284 are enumerated here.
VT-d | - | + |
VT-x | - | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 420 and Xeon Platinum 8284. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR4-2933 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 1 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 140.8 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 420 and Xeon Platinum 8284.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 1 | 28 |
Threads | 1 | 56 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 240 Watt |
Celeron 420 has 585.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8284, on the other hand, has 2700% more physical cores and 5500% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 420 and Xeon Platinum 8284. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron 420 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 8284 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 420 and Xeon Platinum 8284, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.