Ryzen 5 5600X vs Celeron 420

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 420
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.15
Ryzen 5 5600X
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
13.78
+9087%

Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Celeron 420 by a whopping 9087% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3308533
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.65
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency0.4120.06
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)5 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$23$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography65 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size77 mm22x 80.7 + 125 (I/O) mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °C95 °C
Number of transistors105 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600X.

PCIe versionno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 420 0.15
Ryzen 5 5600X 13.78
+9087%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 420 235
Ryzen 5 5600X 21886
+9213%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 13.78
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron 420 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 5600X, on the other hand, has a 9086.7% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 5600X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 420 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 420 and Ryzen 5 5600X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 420
Celeron 420
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Ryzen 5 5600X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 169 votes

Rate Celeron 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 13019 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 420 or Ryzen 5 5600X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.