Athlon 64 2600+ vs Celeron 420

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 420
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.15
Athlon 64 2600+
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 15 Watt
0.15

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 420 and Athlon 64 2600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33243311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.410.95
Architecture codenameConroe-L (2007−2008)Lima (2008−2009)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$23no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 420 and Athlon 64 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Die size77 mm277 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million122 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 420 and Athlon 64 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 420 and Athlon 64 2600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Celeron 420 and Athlon 64 2600+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 420 and Athlon 64 2600+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 420 and Athlon 64 2600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 420 0.15
Athlon 64 2600+ 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 420 235
Athlon 64 2600+ 243
+3.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon 64 2600+ has 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron 420 and Athlon 64 2600+.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 420 and Athlon 64 2600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 420
Celeron 420
AMD Athlon 64 2600+
Athlon 64 2600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 170 votes

Rate Celeron 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 420 or Athlon 64 2600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.