Ultra 7 164U vs Celeron 3965Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3965Y
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.78
Core Ultra 7 164U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 9 Watt
9.89
+1168%

Core Ultra 7 164U outperforms Celeron 3965Y by a whopping 1168% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2621780
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency11.83100.00
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Meteor Lake-U (2023)
Release date21 April 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$448

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads214
Base clock speed1.5 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier13no data
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 4 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1515FCBGA2551
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP-+
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 615Intel® Graphics
Max video memory16 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency850 MHz1.8 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.2
OpenGL4.44.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes168
PCI supportno data4.0 and 3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 3965Y 0.78
Ultra 7 164U 9.89
+1168%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 3965Y 1194
Ultra 7 164U 15106
+1165%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.78 9.89
Recency 21 April 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 14
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 9 Watt

Celeron 3965Y has 50% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 164U, on the other hand, has a 1167.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and 500% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

The Core Ultra 7 164U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3965Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3965Y and Core Ultra 7 164U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3965Y
Celeron 3965Y
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Core Ultra 7 164U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 30 votes

Rate Celeron 3965Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 164U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3965Y or Core Ultra 7 164U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.