Atom Z2560 vs Celeron 3865U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2578not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency5.26no data
Architecture codenameKaby Lake-U (2017)Clovertrail (2013)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)27 February 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeOPIno data
Bus rate4 GT/sno data
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size98.7 mm265 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1356,FPBGA1356FC-MB4760
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response+no data
PAEno data32 Bit
Smart Idleno data+

Security technologies

Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR2
Maximum memory size32 GB2 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s8.5 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 610PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz)
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency900 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.4no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data
USB revisionno data2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0
Number of USB portsno data2
UARTno data3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Celeron 3865U 3224
+205%
Atom Z2560 1056

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Celeron 3865U 1843
+309%
Atom Z2560 451

Geekbench 2

Celeron 3865U 3627
+197%
Atom Z2560 1221

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2017 27 February 2013
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 3 Watt

Celeron 3865U has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z2560, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3865U and Atom Z2560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3865U
Celeron 3865U
Intel Atom Z2560
Atom Z2560

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 116 votes

Rate Celeron 3865U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 10 votes

Rate Atom Z2560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 3865U or Atom Z2560, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.