EPYC 9275F vs Celeron 3855U
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2636 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
Power efficiency | 4.86 | no data |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Turin (2024) |
Release date | 15 August 2015 (9 years ago) | 10 October 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | $3,439 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 48 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
Bus type | OPI | no data |
Bus rate | 4 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 16 | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB | 256 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 98.57 mm2 | 8x 70.6 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1750 Million | 66,520 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 |
Socket | FCBGA1356 | SP5 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 320 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
My WiFi | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
Smart Response | + | no data |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
OS Guard | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-1866/2133, LPDDR3-1600/1866, DDR3L-1333/1600 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 510 | N/A |
Max video memory | 32 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 900 MHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | no data |
Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Max resolution over VGA | N/A | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.4 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 10 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 15 August 2015 | 10 October 2024 |
Physical cores | 2 | 24 |
Threads | 2 | 48 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 320 Watt |
Celeron 3855U has 2033.3% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9275F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 3855U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9275F is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 3855U and EPYC 9275F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.