Atom Z2760 vs Celeron 3755U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 3755U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.67
+294%

Celeron 3755U outperforms Atom Z2760 by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29323511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.892.40
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameBroadwell-U (2015)Cloverview (2012)
Release date1 March 2015 (10 years ago)27 September 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$107no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron 3755U and Atom Z2760 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
Multiplier17no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size82 mm265 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1300 Million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 3755U and Atom Z2760 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1168FC-MB4760
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 3755U and Atom Z2760. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Smart Response-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 3755U and Atom Z2760 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 3755U and Atom Z2760 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d+no data
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 3755U and Atom Z2760. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2
Maximum memory size16 GB2.4 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel ProcessorsPowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Graphics max frequency800 MHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 3755U and Atom Z2760 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 3755U and Atom Z2760 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 3755U and Atom Z2760.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron 3755U 0.67
+294%
Atom Z2760 0.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron 3755U 1182
+297%
Samples: 2
Atom Z2760 298
Samples: 35

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 0.17
Recency 1 March 2015 27 September 2012
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 3 Watt

Celeron 3755U has a 294.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z2760, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Intel Celeron 3755U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z2760 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 3755U
Celeron 3755U
Intel Atom Z2760
Atom Z2760

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 3755U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate Atom Z2760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 3755U and Atom Z2760, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.