Atom x5-E3930 vs Celeron 2981U
Aggregated performance score
Celeron 2981U outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by a small 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 2981U and Atom x5-E3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2642 | 2669 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | 5x Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Apollo Lake (2016) |
| Release date | 1 January 2014 (10 years ago) | 30 August 2014 (9 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $965 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2981U and Atom x5-E3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 56K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 103 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2981U and Atom x5-E3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | Intel BGA 1296 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 7 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2981U and Atom x5-E3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| SIPP | - | no data |
| Smart Response | - | no data |
| GPIO | + | no data |
| Smart Connect | + | no data |
| FDI | - | no data |
| AMT | 9.5 | no data |
| Matrix Storage | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
| HD Audio | + | no data |
| RST | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 2981U and Atom x5-E3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | - | no data |
| OS Guard | - | no data |
| Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2981U and Atom x5-E3930 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2981U and Atom x5-E3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-1866 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
| Quick Sync Video | + | no data |
| Clear Video | + | no data |
| Graphics max frequency | 1 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2981U and Atom x5-E3930 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2981U and Atom x5-E3930.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 4 |
| PCI support | - | no data |
| USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
| Integrated IDE | - | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
| Integrated LAN | - | no data |
| UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Celeron 2981U outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron 2981U outperforms Atom x5-E3930 by 7% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.64 | 0.60 |
| Recency | 1 January 2014 | 30 August 2014 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 7 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron 2981U and Atom x5-E3930.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2981U and Atom x5-E3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
