Ultra 7 165U vs Celeron 2950M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 2950M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 37 Watt
0.78
Core Ultra 7 165U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 15 Watt
11.19
+1335%

Core Ultra 7 165U outperforms Celeron 2950M by a whopping 1335% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2641700
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency2.0070.64
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Meteor Lake-P (2023)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$448

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads214
Base clock speed2 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size118 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA946FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1612
PCI supportno data4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 2950M 0.78
Ultra 7 165U 11.19
+1335%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 2950M 1234
Ultra 7 165U 17779
+1341%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.78 11.19
Recency 1 September 2013 14 December 2023
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 14
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 15 Watt

Ultra 7 165U has a 1334.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 500% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and 146.7% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 165U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 2950M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2950M and Core Ultra 7 165U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2950M
Celeron 2950M
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
Core Ultra 7 165U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 13 votes

Rate Celeron 2950M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 165U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2950M or Core Ultra 7 165U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.