FX-8170 vs Celeron 220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 220 and FX-8170 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release dateOctober 2007 (16 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price$387 no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 220 and FX-8170 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus support533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB8 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size77 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
VID voltage range1V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 220 and FX-8170 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPBGA479AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 220 and FX-8170. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 220 and FX-8170 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 220 and FX-8170 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 220 and FX-8170. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 220 and FX-8170.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 125 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron 220 and FX-8170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron 220 is a notebook processor while FX-8170 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 220 and FX-8170, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 220
Celeron 220
AMD FX-8170
FX-8170

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 58 votes

Rate Celeron 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate FX-8170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 220 or FX-8170, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.