i5-13400F vs Celeron M 540

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 540 and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated418
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.77
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesCeleron Mno data
Power efficiencyno data23.08
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 540 and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 540 and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 540 and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron M 540 and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 540 and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 540 and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 540 and Core i5-13400F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 540 542
i5-13400F 25179
+4546%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 540 1744
i5-13400F 8689
+398%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M 540 803
i5-13400F 13989
+1643%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2007 4 January 2023
Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 16
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 65 Watt

Celeron M 540 has 116.7% lower power consumption.

i5-13400F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and 900% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 540 and Core i5-13400F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Celeron M 540 is a notebook processor while Core i5-13400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 540 and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 540
Celeron M 540
Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 19 votes

Rate Celeron M 540 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3093 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 540 or Core i5-13400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.