Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 vs Celeron 220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3607not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency0.27no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Penryn-L (2008−2009)
Release dateOctober 2007 (18 years ago)29 March 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed1.2 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB64 KB
L2 cache512 KB3 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size77 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistors105 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.3375V1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPBGA479BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 5 Watt

Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Celeron 220 and Intel Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 220
Celeron 220
Intel Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500
Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 65 votes

Rate Celeron 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron 220 and Core 2 Solo ULV SU3500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.