Apple M1 vs Celeron 2.80

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 2.80
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 73 Watt
0.12
Apple M1
2020
8 cores / 8 threads
5.17
+4208%

Apple M1 outperforms Celeron 2.80 by a whopping 4208% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2.80 and M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33631206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency0.16no data
Architecture codenameNorthwood (2002−2004)no data
Release dateNovember 2003 (21 year ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2.80 and M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache8 KB2 MB
L2 cache128 KB16 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography130 nm5 nm
Die size146 mm2no data
Number of transistors55 million16000 Million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2.80 and M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket478no data
Power consumption (TDP)73 Wattno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.80 and M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 2.80 0.12
Apple M1 5.17
+4208%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 2.80 190
Apple M1 8207
+4219%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.12 5.17
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 has a 4208.3% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

The M1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 2.80 in performance tests.

Note that Celeron 2.80 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2.80 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2.80
Celeron 2.80
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 9 votes

Rate Celeron 2.80 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2249 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2.80 or M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.