Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Celeron 2.8 GHz
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 2.8 GHz and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 451 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 52.38 |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | no data | 3 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2.8 GHz and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2.8 GHz and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 52.8 Watt | 28 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 8 |
| Threads | 1 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 52 Watt | 28 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, a 3150% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron 2.8 GHz and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2.8 GHz and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
