Ryzen 5 8640U vs Celeron 2.40
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 2.40 and Ryzen 5 8640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2001−2004) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) |
| Release date | March 2003 (21 year ago) | 6 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Current price | $250 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 2.40 and Ryzen 5 8640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 126 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 8 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 146 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 55 million | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 2.40 and Ryzen 5 8640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 478 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2.40 and Ryzen 5 8640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | DDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2.40 and Ryzen 5 8640U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2.40 and Ryzen 5 8640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2.40 and Ryzen 5 8640U.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 126 x 4.9 GHz AMD Zen 4 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 28 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron 2.40 and Ryzen 5 8640U. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Celeron 2.40 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 8640U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2.40 and Ryzen 5 8640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
