Solo T1200 vs Celeron 1047UE
Aggregate performance score
Celeron 1047UE outperforms Core Solo T1200 by a whopping 194% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 1047UE and Core Solo T1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2910 | 3287 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron | Core Solo |
| Power efficiency | 2.62 | 0.56 |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) | January 2006 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1047UE and Core Solo T1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | 90 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 151 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1047UE and Core Solo T1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | 479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 27 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1047UE and Core Solo T1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron 1047UE and Core Solo T1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1047UE and Core Solo T1200 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1047UE and Core Solo T1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz) | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.47 | 0.16 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 27 Watt |
Celeron 1047UE has a 193.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 58.8% lower power consumption.
The Celeron 1047UE is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1047UE and Core Solo T1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
