Athlon XP 1500+ vs Celeron 1047UE
Primary details
Comparing Celeron 1047UE and Athlon XP 1500+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron | no data |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Palomino (2001) |
| Release date | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) | October 2001 (22 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | no data |
| Current price | no data | $246 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron 1047UE and Athlon XP 1500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.33 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | 150 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 63 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron 1047UE and Athlon XP 1500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1023 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 60 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1047UE and Athlon XP 1500+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
Security technologies
Celeron 1047UE and Athlon XP 1500+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1047UE and Athlon XP 1500+ are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1047UE and Athlon XP 1500+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Celeron 1047UE outperforms Athlon XP 1500+ by 348% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 60 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron 1047UE and Athlon XP 1500+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Celeron 1047UE is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 1500+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1047UE and Athlon XP 1500+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
