Xeon Silver 4310 vs Celeron 1017U

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1017U
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.95
Xeon Silver 4310
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
13.94
+1367%

Xeon Silver 4310 outperforms Celeron 1017U by a whopping 1367% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1017U and Xeon Silver 4310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2500525
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency5.2910.99
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1017U and Xeon Silver 4310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm10 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1017U and Xeon Silver 4310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1017U and Xeon Silver 4310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Celeron 1017U and Xeon Silver 4310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1017U and Xeon Silver 4310 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1017U and Xeon Silver 4310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2667
Maximum memory size32 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1017U and Xeon Silver 4310 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1017U and Xeon Silver 4310.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes1664

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1017U 0.95
Xeon Silver 4310 13.94
+1367%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1017U 1508
Xeon Silver 4310 22146
+1369%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1017U 263
Xeon Silver 4310 1236
+370%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1017U 454
Xeon Silver 4310 7779
+1613%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 13.94
Recency 1 July 2013 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 22 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 120 Watt

Celeron 1017U has 605.9% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4310, on the other hand, has a 1367.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 120% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Silver 4310 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 1017U in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1017U is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4310 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1017U and Xeon Silver 4310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 1017U
Celeron 1017U
Intel Xeon Silver 4310
Xeon Silver 4310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 70 votes

Rate Celeron 1017U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 25 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1017U or Xeon Silver 4310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.