Celeron 927UE vs C-60
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3515 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD C-Series | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 2.14 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Ontario (2011−2012) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 22 August 2011 (14 years ago) | 1 January 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
C-60 and Celeron 927UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on C-60 and Celeron 927UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 256 KB + 1 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by C-60 and Celeron 927UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz) | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by C-60 and Celeron 927UE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by C-60 and Celeron 927UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6290 | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.25 | 0.58 |
| Recency | 22 August 2011 | 1 January 2013 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 9 Watt | 256 Watt |
C-60 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 2744.4% lower power consumption.
Celeron 927UE, on the other hand, has 132% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 81.8% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD C-60 and Intel Celeron 927UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
