Ultra 9 185H vs Atom x7-Z8750

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-Z8750
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.80
Core Ultra 9 185H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 45 Watt
18.45
+2206%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Atom x7-Z8750 by a whopping 2206% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2602319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel AtomIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiencyno data38.82
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date1 April 2016 (8 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$37$640

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads422
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.56 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier16no data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 4 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C110 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA1380FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection+-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 405 (Braswell) (400 - 600 MHz)Intel® Arc™ graphics
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency600 MHz2.35 GHz
Execution Units16no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x21604096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDP2560x16003840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes28
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0
USB revision3.0no data
Number of USB ports3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-Z8750 0.80
Ultra 9 185H 18.45
+2206%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x7-Z8750 1272
Ultra 9 185H 29303
+2204%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom x7-Z8750 179
Ultra 9 185H 2236
+1149%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom x7-Z8750 518
Ultra 9 185H 11928
+2203%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom x7-Z8750 2426
Ultra 9 185H 14053
+479%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom x7-Z8750 24.7
Ultra 9 185H 3.71
+566%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Atom x7-Z8750 133
Ultra 9 185H 2809
+2012%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Atom x7-Z8750 39
Ultra 9 185H 268
+589%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Atom x7-Z8750 1
Ultra 9 185H 11.3
+1077%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Atom x7-Z8750 10
Ultra 9 185H 162
+1519%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Atom x7-Z8750 48
Ultra 9 185H 318
+563%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Atom x7-Z8750 807
Ultra 9 185H 7940
+884%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 18.45
Recency 1 April 2016 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 22

Ultra 9 185H has a 2206.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 300% more physical cores and 450% more threads.

The Core Ultra 9 185H is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-Z8750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-Z8750 and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-Z8750
Atom x7-Z8750
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 20 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 404 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-Z8750 or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.