Ryzen 7 5800X vs Atom x7-E3950

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x7-E3950
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.21
Ryzen 7 5800X
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
18.03
+1390%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by a whopping 1390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 7 5800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2251316
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data41.78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series7x Intel AtomAMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Vermeer (Zen 3)
Release date30 August 2014 (9 years ago)5 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57$449
Current price$377 (6.6x MSRP)$321 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 7 5800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data2 x 80.7 sq. mm; I/O = 125 mm2
Maximum core temperature110 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 7 5800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketIntel BGA 1296AM4
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 7 5800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 7 5800X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 7 5800X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 7 5800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 505-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 7 5800X.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-E3950 1.21
Ryzen 7 5800X 18.03
+1390%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 1390% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom x7-E3950 1864
Ryzen 7 5800X 27882
+1396%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 1396% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom x7-E3950 233
Ryzen 7 5800X 2180
+836%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 836% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom x7-E3950 722
Ryzen 7 5800X 10259
+1321%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 1321% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom x7-E3950 1304
Ryzen 7 5800X 6835
+424%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 424% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom x7-E3950 3769
Ryzen 7 5800X 45548
+1108%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 1108% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom x7-E3950 2152
Ryzen 7 5800X 15873
+638%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 638% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom x7-E3950 30.26
Ryzen 7 5800X 3.04
+895%

Atom x7-E3950 outperforms Ryzen 7 5800X by 895% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Atom x7-E3950 2
Ryzen 7 5800X 29
+1720%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 1720% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x7-E3950 125
Ryzen 7 5800X 2609
+1987%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 1987% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x7-E3950 41
Ryzen 7 5800X 266
+548%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 548% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Atom x7-E3950 0.51
Ryzen 7 5800X 3.09
+506%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 506% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x7-E3950 1
Ryzen 7 5800X 15
+1400%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 1400% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x7-E3950 725
Ryzen 7 5800X 15604
+2052%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 2052% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x7-E3950 9
Ryzen 7 5800X 152
+1552%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 1552% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x7-E3950 45
Ryzen 7 5800X 339
+651%

Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 651% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 18.03
Recency 30 August 2014 5 November 2020
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Cost $57 $449
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 105 Watt

The Ryzen 7 5800X is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x7-E3950 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x7-E3950 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 5800X is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Ryzen 7 5800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Ryzen 7 5800X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 44 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5309 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 5800X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-E3950 or Ryzen 7 5800X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.