Atom C3508 vs x7-E3950
Aggregate performance score
x7-E3950 outperforms C3508 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3508 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2251 | 2279 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 7x Intel Atom | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2016) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 30 August 2014 (9 years ago) | 15 August 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $57 | no data |
| Current price | $377 (6.6x MSRP) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3508 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 224 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | 90 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 103 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3508 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1296 | FCBGA1310 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 11.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3508. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Launched |
Security technologies
Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3508 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | - |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3508 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3508. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4: 1866 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 256 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 29.871 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 505 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3508.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 8 |
| USB revision | no data | 3 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 8 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 8 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | 4x2.5/1 GBE |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
x7-E3950 outperforms C3508 by 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
x7-E3950 outperforms C3508 by 4% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.21 | 1.16 |
| Recency | 30 August 2014 | 15 August 2017 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 11 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3508.
Be aware that Atom x7-E3950 is a notebook processor while Atom C3508 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Atom C3508, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
