Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Atom x5-Z8350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-Z8350
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.58
Ryzen 7 8845HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
18.68
+3121%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by a whopping 3121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-Z8350 and Ryzen 7 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2711291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2016)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4)
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current price$165 no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-Z8350 and Ryzen 7 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.44 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.92 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-Z8350 and Ryzen 7 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketUTFCBGA592FP8
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Ryzen 7 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-5600/LPDDR5x-7500 RAM, PCIe 4, Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
SIPP-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom x5-Z8350 and Ryzen 7 8845HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Boot+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Ryzen 7 8845HS are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Ryzen 7 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types4 GBDDR5
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD GraphicsAMD Radeon 780M
Max video memory2 GBno data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom x5-Z8350 and Ryzen 7 8845HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Ryzen 7 8845HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.41920x1080no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-Z8350 and Ryzen 7 8845HS.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes120
USB revision3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-Z8350 0.58
Ryzen 7 8845HS 18.68
+3121%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 3121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom x5-Z8350 891
Ryzen 7 8845HS 28885
+3142%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 3142% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom x5-Z8350 136
Ryzen 7 8845HS 2392
+1659%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 1659% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom x5-Z8350 375
Ryzen 7 8845HS 11203
+2887%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 2887% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom x5-Z8350 903
Ryzen 7 8845HS 7523
+734%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 734% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom x5-Z8350 2979
Ryzen 7 8845HS 47332
+1489%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 1489% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom x5-Z8350 36.2
Ryzen 7 8845HS 5.3
+583%

Atom x5-Z8350 outperforms Ryzen 7 8845HS by 583% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Atom x5-Z8350 1
Ryzen 7 8845HS 29
+2381%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 2381% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x5-Z8350 97
Ryzen 7 8845HS 2555
+2534%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 2534% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x5-Z8350 28
Ryzen 7 8845HS 274
+879%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 879% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Atom x5-Z8350 0.36
Ryzen 7 8845HS 3.29
+814%

Ryzen 7 8845HS outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by 814% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 18.68
Recency 8 February 2016 6 December 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm

The Ryzen 7 8845HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-Z8350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-Z8350 and Ryzen 7 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
Ryzen 7 8845HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 356 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 247 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8845HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-Z8350 or Ryzen 7 8845HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.