Ryzen 7 7735U vs Atom x5-E8000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Atom x5-E8000
2016
4 cores / 4 threads
0.61

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by a whopping 2162% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen 7 7735U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2665483
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2016)Rembrandt-U Refresh
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$39no data
Current price$340 (8.7x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen 7 7735U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speedno data2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.04 GHz4.75 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen 7 7735U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Socketno dataFP7
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen 7 7735U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen 7 7735U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen 7 7735U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD GraphicsAMD Radeon 680M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen 7 7735U.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanes420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-E8000 0.61
Ryzen 7 7735U 13.80
+2162%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 2162% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom x5-E8000 943
Ryzen 7 7735U 21340
+2163%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 2163% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom x5-E8000 182
Ryzen 7 7735U 1795
+886%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 886% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Atom x5-E8000 597
Ryzen 7 7735U 7784
+1204%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 1204% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom x5-E8000 910
Ryzen 7 7735U 6207
+582%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 582% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom x5-E8000 3219
Ryzen 7 7735U 32220
+901%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 901% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom x5-E8000 1704
Ryzen 7 7735U 10407
+511%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 511% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom x5-E8000 34.57
Ryzen 7 7735U 5.18
+567%

Atom x5-E8000 outperforms Ryzen 7 7735U by 567% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x5-E8000 94
Ryzen 7 7735U 1698
+1706%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 1706% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Atom x5-E8000 27
Ryzen 7 7735U 234
+767%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 767% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x5-E8000 0.6
Ryzen 7 7735U 10.2
+1755%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 1755% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x5-E8000 588
Ryzen 7 7735U 4904
+734%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 734% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x5-E8000 37
Ryzen 7 7735U 229
+522%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 522% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom x5-E8000 8
Ryzen 7 7735U 91
+1096%

Ryzen 7 7735U outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by 1096% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.61 13.80
Integrated graphics card 16.93
Recency 8 February 2016 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 28 Watt

The Ryzen 7 7735U is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E8000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E8000 and Ryzen 7 7735U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E8000
Atom x5-E8000
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
Ryzen 7 7735U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 54 votes

Rate Atom x5-E8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 80 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-E8000 or Ryzen 7 7735U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.