Celeron N5095A vs Atom x5-E8000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom x5-E8000
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 5 Watt
0.62
Celeron N5095A
2021
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.66
+329%

Celeron N5095A outperforms Atom x5-E8000 by a whopping 329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron N5095A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking27331678
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series5x Intel Atomno data
Architecture codenameCherry Trail (2015−2016)no data
Release date8 February 2016 (8 years ago)1 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$39no data

Detailed specifications

Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron N5095A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Boost clock speed1.04 GHzno data
Multiplier10no data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron N5095A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron N5095A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron N5095A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphicsno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron N5095A.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x5-E8000 0.62
Celeron N5095A 2.66
+329%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom x5-E8000 962
Celeron N5095A 4115
+328%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 2.66
Recency 8 February 2016 1 July 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 15 Watt

Atom x5-E8000 has 200% lower power consumption.

Celeron N5095A, on the other hand, has a 329% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 years.

The Celeron N5095A is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E8000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom x5-E8000 is a notebook processor while Celeron N5095A is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E8000 and Celeron N5095A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x5-E8000
Atom x5-E8000
Intel Celeron N5095A
Celeron N5095A

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 56 votes

Rate Atom x5-E8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 85 votes

Rate Celeron N5095A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x5-E8000 or Celeron N5095A, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.