Celeron G3902E vs Atom x5-E3940
Primary details
Comparing Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G3902E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2309 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 5x Intel Atom | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 11.64 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Skylake (2015−2016) |
| Release date | 30 August 2014 (10 years ago) | 2 January 2016 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G3902E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 16 |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 98.57 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 103 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1750 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G3902E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1296 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G3902E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G3902E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G3902E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G3902E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | LPDDR3-1866 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.134 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 500 | Intel HD Graphics 510 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G3902E.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.77 | 1.61 |
| Recency | 30 August 2014 | 2 January 2016 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 25 Watt |
Atom x5-E3940 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 150% lower power consumption.
Celeron G3902E, on the other hand, has 109.1% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 1 year.
We couldn't decide between Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G3902E. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x5-E3940 and Celeron G3902E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
