Celeron E1200 vs Atom Z3740

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z3740 and Celeron E1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release date27 September 2013 (10 years ago)January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$32$40

Detailed specifications

Atom Z3740 and Celeron E1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.33 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data77 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C73 °C
Number of transistorsno data105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3740 and Celeron E1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketUTFCBGA1380LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3740 and Celeron E1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Atom Z3740 and Celeron E1200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3740 and Celeron E1200 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3740 and Celeron E1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z3740 634
+22.9%
Celeron E1200 516

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 65 Watt

Atom Z3740 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 195.5% more advanced lithography process, and 3150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom Z3740 and Celeron E1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom Z3740 is a notebook processor while Celeron E1200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3740 and Celeron E1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z3740
Atom Z3740
Intel Celeron E1200
Celeron E1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 39 votes

Rate Atom Z3740 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 39 votes

Rate Celeron E1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z3740 or Celeron E1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.