Celeron 887 vs Atom Z3735G

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

Comparing Atom Z3735G and Celeron 887 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 September 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$17$86
Current priceno data$300 (3.5x MSRP)

Technical specs

Atom Z3735G and Celeron 887 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.33 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size112 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3735G and Celeron 887 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketUTFCBGA592FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3735G and Celeron 887. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMAno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Atom Z3735G and Celeron 887 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3735G and Celeron 887 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3735G and Celeron 887. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size1 GB16 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidth5.3 GB/s21.3 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 SeriesIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequency646 MHz1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z3735G and Celeron 887 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z3735G and Celeron 887.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom Z3735G 772
+2.4%
Celeron 887 754

Atom Z3735G outperforms Celeron 887 by 2% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom Z3735G 946
Celeron 887 1877
+98.4%

Celeron 887 outperforms Atom Z3735G by 98% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom Z3735G 2891
Celeron 887 3597
+24.4%

Celeron 887 outperforms Atom Z3735G by 24% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom Z3735G 1526
+7.9%
Celeron 887 1414

Atom Z3735G outperforms Celeron 887 by 8% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom Z3735G 37.53
+27.9%
Celeron 887 48

Celeron 887 outperforms Atom Z3735G by 28% in wPrime 32.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom Z3735G 0.6
+520%
Celeron 887 0.1

Atom Z3735G outperforms Celeron 887 by 520% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Atom Z3735G 1397
+41.7%
Celeron 887 986

Atom Z3735G outperforms Celeron 887 by 42% in WinRAR 4.0.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 9 April 2014 1 September 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Cost $17 $86
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 17 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom Z3735G and Celeron 887. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3735G and Celeron 887, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G
Intel Celeron 887
Celeron 887

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 44 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 14 votes

Rate Celeron 887 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z3735G or Celeron 887, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.