Athlon 64 X2 4800+ vs Atom Z3735G

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z3735G
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 2 Watt
0.49
+14%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.43

Atom Z3735G outperforms Athlon 64 X2 4800+ by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z3735G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28922962
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Seriesno data2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)
Power efficiency23.190.63
Architecture codenameBay Trail-T (2013−2014)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date9 April 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$17no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z3735G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data1000 MHz
L1 cache56K (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MBno data
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size112 mm2no data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z3735G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketUTFCBGA592no data
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z3735G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Security technologies

Atom Z3735G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z3735G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+ are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z3735G and Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size1 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth5.3 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Seriesno data
Graphics max frequency646 MHzno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom Z3735G 0.49
+14%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 0.43

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z3735G 772
+13.7%
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 679

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom Z3735G 1526
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ 1798
+17.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 0.43
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 65 Watt

Atom Z3735G has a 14% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 3150% lower power consumption.

The Atom Z3735G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom Z3735G is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z3735G and Athlon 64 X2 4800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Athlon 64 X2 4800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 66 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 75 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z3735G or Athlon 64 X2 4800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.