Celeron J1800 vs Atom Z2560
Aggregate performance score
Celeron J1800 outperforms Atom Z2560 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3467 | 3334 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 7.51 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Clovertrail (2013) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| Release date | 27 February 2013 (12 years ago) | 1 November 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $72 |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2560 and Celeron J1800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.41 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.58 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 65 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2560 and Celeron J1800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FC-MB4760 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2560 and Celeron J1800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| PAE | 32 Bit | 36 Bit |
| FDI | no data | - |
| Smart Idle | + | no data |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Atom Z2560 and Celeron J1800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2560 and Celeron J1800 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2560 and Celeron J1800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 792 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2560 and Celeron J1800 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2560 and Celeron J1800.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
| USB revision | 2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0 | no data |
| Number of USB ports | 2 | no data |
| UART | 3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.21 | 0.33 |
| Recency | 27 February 2013 | 1 November 2013 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 10 Watt |
Atom Z2560 has 100% more threads, and 233.3% lower power consumption.
Celeron J1800, on the other hand, has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Celeron J1800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z2560 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
